• Direct Tax
  • Indirect Tax
  • Corporate Law
  • Services
  • Consultation
  • Templates
  • Courses
  • Plans

Categories

Direct Tax
Indirect Tax
Corporate Law

Quick links

  • Services
  • Consultation
  • Templates
  • Courses
  • Plans
Indirect Tax
|
  • Blogs
  • Notice Board

For any queries, concerns or feedback, please connect with us at:

contact@counselvise.com
+91 97234 00220
Direct Tax
  • Judges
  • Assessee
  • Blogs
  • Judgements
Indirect Tax
  • Judges
  • Assessee
  • Blogs
  • Judgements
Corporate Law
  • Judges
  • Assessee
  • Blogs
  • Judgements
Other Links
  • Services
  • Consultation
  • Templates
  • Terms and conditions
  • Contact us
  • Support
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund Policy
  • Delivery Policy
Subscribe to our newsletter


Crafted Mindfully at
© Copyright Adviselo Collab Studios Private Limited © 2026 All rights Reserved.

Residency Rules: Income Tax Act, 1961 vs Income Tax Bill, 2025 — A Subtle Yet Significant Shift!

Team CounselviseTeam Counselvise-February 18, 2026
free

Residential status is one of the most critical factors in determining an individual’s tax exposure in India. For decades, Section 6 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 laid down clear and well-understood rules to decide whether a person qualifies as a Resident or Non-Resident.

With the proposed Income-tax Bill, 2025, while the overall framework remains intact, a subtle but important tightening has been introduced; one that individuals working overseas and tax professionals must not overlook.

What the law said earlier (Income-tax Act, 1961)-

Under Income Tax Act, 1961 an individual was treated as a “Resident” if they:

    • Stayed in India for 182 days or more in a year, or
    • Stayed for 60 days in the year and 365 days in the preceding four years

However, there was a significant relief. If an Indian citizen left India for the purpose of employment abroad, Explanation 1(b) under Section 6 of the Act ( i.e. the 60+365 day condition) did not apply.
In practice, this phrase was interpreted widely; covering even those who went abroad to explore or search for job opportunities.

What changes under the Income-tax Bill, 2025-

The proposed Bill narrows this relief.

The exemption from the 60+365 day rule now applies only when:

    • A person leaves India as a crew member of an Indian ship, or
    • Leaves India for actual employment outside India

The earlier, broader phrase “for the purpose of employment” has been consciously replaced. This linguistic shift materially raises the bar.

Why this matters in real life

    • Earlier, individuals going abroad without a confirmed job could still claim Non-Resident status.
    • Going forward, mere job hunting abroad may not suffice.
    • Without proof of overseas employment, individuals may end up being classified as Residents, triggering taxation of global income in India, and Increased reporting and compliance obligations.

Closing thoughts

What appears to be a minor drafting change is, in reality, a policy-driven tightening of residency norms. The objective is to prevent the misuse of Non-Resident status based solely on temporary overseas movement without substantive employment.

Professionals, NRIs, and consultants planning to move abroad for career opportunities should carefully evaluate this change and plan accordingly.

Print Friendly, PDF & EmailPrint

Share this post

Team Counselvise

Team Counselvise

Related posts

GST

Rule 31D under GST: MRP-Based Valuation Explained (Effective 1 February 2026)

Team CounselviseTeam Counselvise-January 26, 2026
Income Tax

Revisionary Powers under the Black Money Act

Team CounselviseTeam Counselvise-January 28, 2026
Income Tax

Section 54 is about Intent, Not Brick-by-Brick Completion

Team CounselviseTeam Counselvise-January 24, 2026

1-to-1

Guide to Charitable Trusts: Formation, Benefits, and Compliance
dummy

Anuj Patchigar

₹0

PAID

Form AOC-2 - Disclosure of Related Party Transaction
dummyMehul
₹50