• Direct Tax
  • Indirect Tax
  • Corporate Law
  • Services
  • Consultation
  • Templates
  • Courses
  • Plans

Categories

Direct Tax
Indirect Tax
Corporate Law

Quick links

  • Services
  • Consultation
  • Templates
  • Courses
  • Plans
Direct Tax
|
  • Judgements
  • Blogs
  • Judges
  • Assessee
  • Notice Board

For any queries, concerns or feedback, please connect with us at:

contact@counselvise.com
+91 97234 00220
Direct Tax
  • Judges
  • Assessee
  • Blogs
  • Judgements
Indirect Tax
  • Judges
  • Assessee
  • Blogs
  • Judgements
Corporate Law
  • Judges
  • Assessee
  • Blogs
  • Judgements
Other Links
  • Services
  • Consultation
  • Templates
  • Terms and conditions
  • Contact us
  • Support
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund Policy
  • Delivery Policy
Subscribe to our newsletter

Crafted Mindfully at
© Copyright Adviselo Collab Studios Private Limited © 2026 All rights Reserved.
  1. direct tax
  2. /
  3. judges
  4. /
  5. a l gehlot accountant member

A L GEHLOT

Total Cases in our repository: 1988

Filters

Clear all

Appeal Type

1336

445

158

49

Assessment Year

164

1

3

11

90

161

186

262

285

211

161

101

104

67

42

41

26

14

20

14

10

3

5

3

2

1

Bench

974

522

265

125

75

25

2

Bench with Courts

974

522

265

125

75

25

2

Keywords

247

217

215

212

162

155

139

138

125

117

115

111

107

102

98

97

95

92

88

82

Result in favour of

1130

532

315

Sections

286

245

177

160

141

124

121

115

107

107

97

93

91

88

88

85

72

71

68

61

Year Of Pronouncement

289

275

613

463

318

29

1

Sort by

The DCIT, Circle-1, RAJKOT-GUJARAT V. M/s. Backbone Projects Ltd., RAJKOT-GUJARAT

ITA 370/RJT/2007

1998-1999

Pronouncement Date: 02-12-2007

Result: Assessee

Rajkot

Bonafide beliefSet aside271(1)(c)
3

M/s. Shivsagar Veg. Restaurant, Mumbai V. Addl. CIT 24(2), Mumbai

ITA 5686/MUM/2004

2001-2002

Pronouncement Date: 27-11-2009

Result: Partly Allowed

Mumbai

Business incomeDepreciationLoose papers question of lawCorroborative evidencesBlock assessmentRetractionSet aside43B133A250251145263132
2

KAMAL ROOPCHAND JAIN, MUMBAI V. ITO WD 25(2)(1), MUMBAI

ITA 2354/MUM/2009

2003-2004

Pronouncement Date: 18-11-2009

Result: Assessee

Mumbai

DepreciationOpportunity of being heardOnus to proveCapital Gains271(1)(c)143(1)274251139(1)27281015
5

SHRI. YOGESH DILIP GODAMBE, MUMBAI V. I.T.O. WD 18(2)(1), MUMBAI

ITA 2867/MUM/2009

2005-2006

Pronouncement Date: 18-11-2009

Result: Partly Allowed

Mumbai

6

ATUL M. OZA, MUMBAI V. ITO 24(1)(3), MUMBAI

ITA 3215/MUM/2009

2006-2007

Pronouncement Date: 18-11-2009

Result: Partly Allowed

Mumbai

Depreciation
7

Sri. NALIKANT B. SANGHAVI, MUMBAI V. ITO Wd. - 7(3), MUMBAI

ITA 6651/MUM/2006

2003-2004

Pronouncement Date: 20-10-2009

Result: Assessee

Mumbai

GiftIncome from undisclosed sourcesAccommodation entries143(3)13168
9

The ITO, Ward-1(4), Dwarka V. Shri Polabha Virambha Manek,

ITA 1038/RJT/2009

2004-2005

Pronouncement Date: 04-11-2009

Result: Assessee

Rajkot

143(3)142(1)133(6)144
6

DINESH V. PATEL, MUMBAI V. DCIT CEN CIR-24, MUMBAI

ITA 7217/MUM/2008

2001-2002

Pronouncement Date: 17-12-2009

Result: Partly Allowed

Mumbai

Source of fundinitiation of penalty proceedingsBlock assessmentCommercial expediencycapital expenditure 234B2
8

M/s. SWATI SYNTHETICS LTD., MUMBAI V. ITO - 4(3)(4), MUMBAI

ITA 1165/MUM/2006

2001-2002

Pronouncement Date: 17-12-2009

Result: Assessee

Mumbai

Capital assetDepreciationRetrospective amendmentquestion of lawCost of acquisitionCommercial expediencyCapital Gains143(3)41(2)19119232
3

DCIT 8(2), MUMBAI V. OLYMPUS ELEVATORS LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 619/MUM/2009

2005-2006

Pronouncement Date: 17-12-2009

Result: Assessee

Mumbai

DepreciationCost of acquisitioncapital expenditureTDS133(6)3215468
2
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • •••
  • 50
  • Next